lapse of time.
PW35 was cross examined by Ld. Addl. PP . In cross examination, he
identified accused Manoj @ Aslam.
21. PW36 Madan Singh working ... register of the hotel. This witness was cross
examined by Ld. Addl. PP. In cross examination, he deposed that he could not
identify those person
gave in writing to the
IO regarding such comparison of rates. However, IO in the cross examination
stated that PW4 Rajesh Kataria and PW7 Yugdutt ... examination that he had issued this letter on telephonic
information sought by the IO and he never met the IO in his life. Thus, IO
IO in his cross-examination that whether he
wanted to refresh his memory by checking his case diary during the cross-
examination, which ... Question
Nos. 3,7,9 and 10 of the cross-examination of IO, which is annexed as
Annexure P-6 to the instant petition
Mahazar itself, and
admitted by PW25/IO in his cross examination, though the
accused as per his schedule submitted to IO has
categorically stated ... Rental Agreement, relied upon by
the accused. PW25/IO during crossexamination has
admitted that, he has taken the rental income in respect
case learned Sh. Adit S. Pujari conducted
detailed crossexamination of this witness. In his cross
examination he stated that accused had orally told ... detailed further crossexamination was later on
conducted by learned Sh. Pujari. In his further cross
examination IO stated that he had sent someone
cross examination of IO was done by the defence. In the
cross examination, IO admitted that there is no evidence regarding blood
group ... they heard any
commotion from the room of incidence. In the cross examination, IO
stated that as per his investigation, accused Dharmender Singh was
living
shoes and stone were identified by the IO. In the cross
examination, IO stated that accused Safique had disclosed about shoes in
his second disclosure ... residents of the adjacent house of the
complainant. In the cross examination, IO stated that though he does not
remember if the complainant had told
stated in his crossexamination that Harmeet Singh was
his cousin brother, whereas PW13 stated in his cross examination
that Harmeet Singh ... aforesaid money transaction. It was further contended that IO/PW
22 stated in his cross examination that he had made enquiry
regarding the previous dispute
report has been
proved as Ex.PW27/E. In the cross examination, Sh. DP Gupta admitted that
he did not meet the Pradhan / Mukhiya ... produced before the Court. The
witness admitted in the cross examination that he did not enquire from any
of the neighbour of the accused
Jain CC No.11/13 Page 23 of 95
In the cross examination, IO stated that he had calculated the
salary income of the accused ... same, as on the dates of intimation to the
department. During cross examination, IO examined, confidential file (D74)
and income tax returns
