Binda Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2026
punishable under
Sections 147 , 148 , 149 , 448 , 427 , 353 , 332 , 427 of the IPC
and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 65 (1.13 seconds)Md. Rashid @ David vs The State Of Bihar on 7 January, 2026
offences punishable under Sections 353 , 307 , 332 , 333 , 412 and
414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections
Md. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 379 , 427 , 279 , 337 , 504 of the Indian
Penal Code .
3. The petitioner is the owner of the Swift Desire
which suffered
Chunchun Khatun vs The State Of Bihar on 17 April, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 427 and 120(B) of the IPC and Section
9 of Bihar Control of use and play of Loudspeaker
Champa Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 6 February, 2026
353 , 307 ,
332 , 333 , 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections
30(a) & 45 of the Excise Act.
3. The prosecution
Rakesh Kumar Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 17 April, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 427 and 120(B) of the IPC and Section
9 of Bihar Control of use and play of Loudspeaker
Surendar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 11 February, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 307 , 427 , 379 , 504 , 506 of the
Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, a mob of about
Arjun Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 11 March, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 307 , 337 ,
354B , 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named
Pappu Ram @ Pappu Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 17 January, 2026
under Section 147 , 148 ,
149 , 332 , 333 , 341 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 307 , 353 , 504 of the IPC and
Sections
Rohit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 February, 2026
332 , 333 , 353 , 427 , 307 , 120B , 337 , 338 , 506
of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 , 4 of the Prevention of
Damage to Public