Acit, Circle- 15(2), New Delhi vs Lord Krishna Realinfra Pvt. Ltd., New ... on 18 May, 2026
mismatch with the figures in Form 26AS of ITD database itself can not be a ground
to hold that there is understatement of receipts
Search Results Page
Search Results
31 - 40 of 852 (0.32 seconds)Spectrum Infonet Pvt. Ltd., Raigarh vs Pr. Cit (Central), Bhopal on 14 July, 2023
Reasons for the belief that income had escaped assessment
As per ITD database and e-filing ITBA portal, return was filed till assessment year
Amit Gupta (Huf), New Delhi vs Ito Ward - 31(4), New Delhi on 26 May, 2022
ITD information, Rajesh Gupta (HUF) is having PAN:
AAGHR9262M address at 14, Sainik Farm, Lane C-3, Khanpur,
New Delhi. Further, as per ITD database ... Sainik Farm, Lane C-3,
Khanpur, New Delhi. Further, as per ITD database, the
aforesaid assessee filed his return of income
The Acit, Central Circle-2(4),, ... vs Ambe Tradecorp Pvt. Ltd.(Formerly ... on 7 February, 2022
land transactions were called out from the
data available in the ITD database.
7.6 From the perusal of the assessment order dated
Ito, Ward-52(2), New Delhi vs Gaurav Khullar, New Delhi on 28 May, 2024
recorded that on physical verification as well as from the ITD
Database, it had been gathered that the assessee has not filed
the return ... said information ought to have been available on the ITD
Database available to the AO. The assessment order
acknowledges filing of income tax return
Advent Vinimay Private Limited, ... vs Ito, Ward-9(1), Kolkata on 14 May, 2024
Investment during the relevant F.Y.
However, on verification of the ITD database, and comparison
of the Balance Sheet
Alma Assets Consultancy Private ... vs Ito, Ward-4(3), Kolkata. , Kolkata on 20 May, 2024
transactions are cast deposits followed by RTGS debits. On perusal the
ITD database, it has been found that the assessee has never filed his
return
Kisan International Trading Fze,New ... vs Acit, Int. Tax 2(1)(2), Delhi on 19 November, 2025
reasons for re-opening emerged. Pertinently, as per the order, the
ITD database of the petitioner assessee revealed that the petitioner
had received
Naem Khan,Delhi vs Ito Ward-46(4), New Delhi on 20 February, 2025
order recorded that on physical verification as well
as from the ITD database, it was gathered that no return had been filed by
the assessee
Hemu Estate Developers P. Ltd., Mumbai vs Ito -10(1)(3), Mumbai on 16 May, 2023
placed in the file nor visible in the
online database, (ITD)(ITBA) for the assessment year 2009-10 & 2010-
11. It is evident from