came to the conclusion that
the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under ... proceedings and the criminal case
are based on identical and similar set of facts and the charges in
the criminal case against the delinquent employee
proceedings and the
criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts
and the charges in the criminal case against the delinquent
employee ... came to the conclusion
that the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
proceedings and the
criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts and
the charges in the criminal case against the delinquent
employee ... came to the conclusion that
the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
proceedings and the
criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts
and the charges in the criminal case against the delinquent
employee ... came to the conclusion
that the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
proceedings and the
criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts
and the charges in the criminal case against the delinquent
employee ... came to the conclusion that
the first two Articles of charges are identical to the
charge levelled against the petitioner before the special
court under
proceedings and the
criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts
and the charges in the criminal case against the delinquent
employee ... came to the conclusion
that the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
raising a plea that the charges in the departmental proceedings and those in
the criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts ... came to the conclusion that the first two Articles of charges are identical
to the charge levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
identical
facts and the evidence in the matter, it was also required to
take into consideration the question as to whether the charges
levelled against ... came to the conclusion
that the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
this
regard must take into consideration the fact as to whether the
charges as also the evidence in both the proceedings are
common ... came to the conclusion
that the first two Articles of charges are identical to the charge
levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
identical facts and the evidence in the matter, it was also
required to take into consideration the question as to whether the charges
levelled against ... came to the conclusion that the first two Articles of charges are identical
to the charge levelled against the petitioner before the special court under
