misappropriation of Rs.4,39,617/-. In departmental proceedings with identical charges, the appellant was exonerated on the ground that it was not clear ... departmental proceeding was initiated against the appellant with regard to identical charges made in the FIR......
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
28. .......Considering the fact that
attained finality. Therefore, no departmental proceedings
under the impugned proceedings on identical charges as that of the criminal
proceedings are maintainable. Despite the above order ... admittedly, no charges were framed by the CBI court at that time
and this Tribunal opined that the charges seem to be identical. In fact
attained finality. Therefore, no departmental proceedings
under the impugned proceedings on identical charges as that of the criminal
proceedings are maintainable. Despite the above order ... admittedly, no charges were framed by the CBI court at that time
and this Tribunal opined that the charges seem to be identical. In fact
attained finality. Therefore, no departmental proceedings
under the impugned proceedings on identical charges as that of the criminal
proceedings are maintainable. Despite the above order ... admittedly, no charges were framed by the CBI court at that time
and this Tribunal opined that the charges seem to be identical. In fact
misappropriation of Rs.4,39,617/-. In departmental proceedings
with identical charges, the appellant was exonerated on the
ground that it was not clear ... departmental proceeding was initiated against the appellant
with regard to identical charges made in the FIR......
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
28. ........Considering the fact that
learned Single Judge on the premise that once an inquiry on identical charges had already been conducted through the Economic Offence Wing of the Government ... which opined that the charges levelled were not substantiated then on identical charges a subsequent inquiry by another specialized wing of the Government was nothing
finding of investigation and the material on
record in respect to identical charges had decided not to initiate
disciplinary proceeding and as stated hereinabove ... open for the
respondents to institute disciplinary proceeding for the said
identical charges. Ld. Counsel would argue that the decision to
initiate disciplinary proceeding vide
proceedings and disciplinary proceedings are
based on the same set of Identical charges. The Disciplinary Authority herein,
with a view to delaythe appellant ... 00416/2022 &
MA 310/00470/2023
identical charges. Since the Hon'ble CBI Court acquitted the Applicant
honourably, the Departmental proceedings initiated against
proceedings and disciplinary proceedings are
based on the same set of Identical charges. The Disciplinary Authority herein,
with a view to delaythe appellant ... 00416/2022 &
MA 310/00470/2023
identical charges. Since the Hon'ble CBI Court acquitted the Applicant
honourably, the Departmental proceedings initiated against
Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Banaskantha at Palanpur
for trial. Charges were framed against A1, A2, A3 and A4 in
Sessions Case ... Sections 396 and
397 of the IPC. Identical charges came to be framed against A5 in
Sessions Case No. 143 of 1990. The accused pleaded
