Imperia Structures Ltd. vs Anil Patni And Anr. Etc. on 2 November, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 70, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 822
Author ... CIVIL APPEAL DIARY NO.9796/2019
M/s Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni
1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Imperia Structure Ltd. vs Brig. Harit Pant on 28 March, 2022
Author: Uday Umesh Lalit
Bench: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha , S. Ravindra Bhat , Uday Umesh Lalit ... CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.1816 OF 2022
M/s. IMPERIA STRUCTURE LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
BRIG. HARIT PANT Respondent
This question is no more res integra. In Imperia Structures Ltd v. Anil
Patni11 , this Court speaking through Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, examined the
jurisdiction ... Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ,
and the RERA Act, 2016 . In Imperia Structures, also, like in the present case,
the proceedings arose out of the decision
Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. vs Abhishek Khanna on 11 January, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIR
M/S Newtech Promoters And Developers ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 11 November
date of presentation of the present appeal, the
9
Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni , (2020) 10 SCC 783
18
occupancy certificate was not forthcoming
consumer for injustice suffered by
him.”
12. In M/s. Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni and another4, and IREO
Grace Realtech Private Limited
remedies that can be availed of
by them, including arbitration. In Imperia Structures Ltd. v Anil Patni 15, this
Court held that the remedies available
MATTER OF STATION
FIR
1 52/2016 M/S IMPERIA Related to EOW,Delhi
STRUCTURES LTD not
delivering
the
possession of
2
the sold
plots ... entered into by the
accused company with the complainant M/s Imperia Structures
Ltd. to allot plots in the said project and had even obtained
Bharati's case (supra), Rule of Law is a basic structure of the Constitution apart from democracy. The rule of law postulates the pervasiveness ... over the Commission argues itself. No one is an imperium in imperia in our constitutional order. It is reasonable to hold that the Commissioner cannot
