Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23170 (3.32 seconds)

Jai Shree Yadav vs State Of U.P on 12 August, 2004

held by the two courts below we do not think these contradictions, improvements and omissions would affect the credibility of this witness either. The next ... partisan witness and in his witness too a large number of contradictions, improvements and omissions were established during the cross-examination. We must notice that
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 67 - Full Document

State vs 1. Chander Mani Singh Thakur on 24 August, 2022

their cross examinations, though some contradictions have been pointed out by the defence, however, those contradictions/improvements do not prove fatal to the case ... consideration whether the contradictions/omissions were of such magnitude so as to materially affect the trial. Minor contradictions, inconsistencies, embellishments or improvements in relation
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 March, 2023

appellants were abetting the deceased to commit suicide (although the contradictions, omissions and improvements cannot be ignored which are carved in their testimony), the offence ... examination in-chief of prosecution witnesses by totally ignoring the contradictions, omissions and improvements that have arrived at in their cross examination. That after going
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - R K Verma - Full Document

Sc No. 58096/16 , Fir No. 96/12 Ps. Vijay ... vs . Rahul @ Kake & Ors Page No. 1 on 31 May, 2017

accused Vinod has  submitted that there are material discrepancies, contradictionsimprovements and  exaggerations in the testimonies alleged eye witnesses  PW1, PW3 & PW4, who  were ... star witnesses of the prosecution and such discrepancies, contradictionsimprovements and exaggerations are fatal to the prosecution case particularly on  the point of identity
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sc No. 58415/16 , Fir No. 27/14 Ps. Knk ... vs . Sant Ram Page No. 1 on 26 July, 2017

Counsel for the accused has submitted that there are material discrepancies, contradictionsimprovements and exaggerations   in   the   testimonies   of   Sh.   Arun,   PW2,   the complainant ... complainant on the point of number of assailants and   the   contradictions,   improvements   and   exaggerations   in   his testimony are fatal to the Prosecution case.      Thus
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 November, 2010

making statements before the court during trial. There were material contradictions and improvements, which were not mere elaborations of their statements already made. Thus, their ... whether the contradictions/omissions had been of such 21 magnitude that they may materially affect the trial. Minor contradictions, inconsistencies, embellishments or improvements on trivial
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 805 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next