board resolution dt 12.04.2019, Mark A.
2) Copy of consent action dated 24.04.2019, Mark B.
3) Copy of global incentive compensation plan, Mark ... Indian Evidence Act filed by the defendants marked as
Mark C is the Global Incentive Plan admissible in evidence and
the plaintiff cannot be allowed
exhibited and now marked as
Mark-C;
(vi) The certified copy of Award dt. 16.12.2021 mentioned in Digitally
signed by
evidence affidavit ... marked as Mark-D;
16:57:42
+0530
(vii) Appointment letter dt. 22.11.2011 is Mark A;
(viii) Copy of calculation sheet for incentives is Mark
2011 Page No. 7 of 22
notice is marked as mark B and incentive policy is marked as
mark A, postal receipts ... record a copy of a policy
which is Mark A, dated 01.06.2011 by which incentive policy of
Supervisors is prescribed but in the same various
incentives
would be paid.
20. PW1 relied upon the list of work for incentives for
the year 2017-2018 Mark PW1/6 (colly ... aforesaid lists were prepared. He denied that documents Mark
PW1/6 (colly) and Mark PW1/7 (Colly) were forged and
fabricated. PW1 deposed
retainership agreement dated on
26.07.2006 (Mark-CW1/X/F), the payment of incentives
was subject to execution of private equity deals, joint
ventures and land ... complainant that as per the agreements which
are Mark CW1/X/F and Mark CW1/X/G, according to the
complainant the above
plaintiff
served the legal notice dated 13.06.2016 Mark B (colly)
claiming the annual MBO incentive of Rs.3,76,616/. It is
argued that
period of three years hence even if defendant is entitled to
2% incentive he can recover only three years prior to filing of the counter ... incentive @2%
on the total business as agreed between the plaintiff and defendant. He has proved
his ledger account from 01.01.1996 to 31.03.1996 as Mark
Mark A, copy of letter of Intent pertaining to job issued from M/s Tech Squad
Today Pvt Ltd dated 10.10.2013 is Mark B, copy ... correct that offered salary mentioned on
Mark B is Rs. 1,20,000/ per annum plus performance incentive. He denied the
suggestion that
performance linked incentive. He identified and relied
upon the following documents :
a) Board resolutions dated 03.11.2009 and 30.03.2010 as
Mark A and Mark B respectively ... plaintiff is not entitled to performance linked
incentive since his performance was not up to the mark.
21. In order to evaluate the rival contentions
that which is
the amount in Mark D1/3 which was paid to the plaintiff as incentive for the disputed
period. Mere filing ... ledger account of the defendant Mark D1/3 not even a single payment is shown as
incentive in the month of December 2015. Only
