nearest dealer to supply the cars. The appellant;
allows, nominal mark-up / incentive to the dealer for
reimbursing the dealer on account of cost ... letter dated 1-4-2008 for
substantiating the fact that the incentives / mark-ups allowed
to the dealers was necessary for reimbursing the costs
incurred
incentive is not
awarded to the petitioners, in the present selection, then it can never be. The
incentive i.e. weightage marks, a fall ... applicable only in
respect of the pandemic. The present grant of incentive marks is also a
fall out of the COVID - 19 pandemic and therefore
applicable only in respect
of the pandemic. The present grant of incentive marks is also
a fall out of the COVID - 19 pandemic and therefore ... said rule cannot come in the way of grant of
incentive marks to these Medical Officers who put their life at
risk. Gratitude and recognition
Rittika Sharma vs Health And Family Welfare on 22 December, 2023
(1)
Central Administrative Tribunal
question of grace marks does not arise because the
applicants have scored below 40% marks and the grace
marks are available only when the question ... grace marks. Rules do not say that
candidates who have scored marks between 40% and 50%
are only entitled to grace marks.
9. Learned counsel
approach of benchmarking by reducing
the export incentive from the total cost and then determined the
mark up of 5% on total cost to arrive ... allowing the
taxpayer to reduce the export incentives to calculate the value of
the goods sold and made the total enhancement of taxpayer
subject FY, mark-up
of 8% was mistakenly charged by ACSI during the first 3 months. However,
such mark-up was reversed during the subsequent ... makingentities and there was no tax incentives earned by the assessee
at any point oftime. Thus, charging of mark up on support service
charges which
avowed policy
declared was that 100% of the banks investment should
be marked to market and this process should be
completed within the next three ... vibrant debt market. It is stated that marking to market
the entire portfolio eliminates the incentive for imprudent
mark.
The auditor did not see the receipts at the time of audit although commission is duly provided in audited accounts.
(15)
The incentive commission ... receipts of commission did not bear audit marks when the audited accounts duly recorded provision of incentive bonus in the assessment year under appeal
shortfall in the cost plus
5% mark up - Rs 8,74,22,903/-
Incentive earned at the regional level ... observed that the incentives received from HUL fall
under the Stretching rating and % of incentives would be 10% of the fees
which will make
