retainership agreement dated on
26.07.2006 (Mark-CW1/X/F), the payment of incentives
was subject to execution of private equity deals, joint
ventures and land ... complainant that as per the agreements which
are Mark CW1/X/F and Mark CW1/X/G, according to the
complainant the above
performance of
plaintiff was not up to mark for said period, however, he was paid
incentives for said period as promised/agreed. The plaintiff
assured ... performance of the plaintiff being not up to mark dis-entitling him
for payment of any incentives appears to be more probable on the
scales
documents
filed by the plaintiff i.e. Mark A, B and C tell a totally different story.
Mark A,B and C even though ... scheme period". Mark B and C are
signed on behalf of M/s OPP Mobile Delhi Pvt. Ltd. Mark A,B and C
does
found eligible for incentive of Rs.1,76,940.97/- under the Long Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP). Company took a stand that incentive was payable
subject ... incentive of
Rs.1,76,940.97/- under an incentive plan. Plaintiff has placed on record a
letter dated 01.04.2010 (Mark-A) issued by the Managing
Study of respondent/ plaintiff's bank account statement
(Mark A) has credit entries dated 14.09.2012, 09.10.2012,
29.10.2012, description of which is shown ... heads 'salary'
and 'incentive'. The inference that can thus, be drawn from study
of Mark A, is that the respondent/ plaintiff
show and prove that
he was entitled to incentives (and what was the basis of receiving
incentives), some monetary benefit on account of Referral Policy ... legal notice Mark E issued by the plaintiff to
the defendant and Ex. PW1/6 which is reply to legal notice, Mark
Page no. 2 of 8
payment of his due salary and the incentives. The defendant replied that only ... mark. The defendant had specifically
denied the sales which were allegedly done by the plaintiff and the incentives thereto.
Further, it is stated that
basis to the main
godown, direct and indirect taxes and all other incentive/service
CS (Comm) No. 591 /21 Nishtha Enterprises v/s Mirik Health ... record, the
plaintiff had taken the godown on rent vide rent agreement Mark
A. He proved the payment vouchers in respect of rent
defendant company as to
whether he was authorized to offer such schemes, incentives, targets, on
behalf of the defendant company.
17. The plaintiff also stated ... bills Mark A
C.S. No.241/16 SMT. MADHVI JAIN VS. M/S BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD.. Page 15 of 25
to Mark
Physiotherapist
and was getting salary of Rs. 10,000/- per month and incentives. Her
deceased daughter was also imparting services of physiotherapy to various
patients ... Form for verification of tenants showing
tenanted address of the deceased as Mark A, original treatment record of
deceased as Ex. PW1/17 (colly
