Indranil Mukherjee vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 21 April, 2022
Author: Kausik Chanda
Bench: Kausik Chanda
1
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Justice Kausik Chanda
C.R.R. NO. 1555 OF 2021
INDRANIL MUKHERJEE
-VERSUS-
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS
For the petitioner : Mr. Ayan
Indranil Mukherjee vs State Of Gujarat And Others Reported In ... on 31 January, 2017
Author: Asha Arora
Bench: Asha Arora ... Assigned)
(44)
(sg) In re : Indranil Mukherjee ... Petitioner
Re : An application under Section 397/401 read with
Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
treated Indranil for his kidney ailment and prescribed medicines to him. The
medical condition of Indranil deteriorated under treatment of accused Supriyo
Mukherjee to such ... Mukherjee. The letterheads Ex. P4
used by accused Supriyo Mukherjee have the following description of accused
Supriyo Mukherjee printed on the top :
Dr. Supriyo Mukherjee
India.
Petitioner also cited another decision of this court reported in Indranil
Mukherjee vs. State of West Bengal and another 2018(4)AICLR395
investigation. The same ratio is laid down in the case of
Indranil Mukherjee Vs. State of West Bengal reported
investigation. The same ratio is laid down in the case of
Indranil Mukherjee Vs. State of West Bengal reported
investigation. The same ratio is laid down in the case of
Indranil Mukherjee Vs. State of West Bengal reported
investigation. The same ratio is laid down in the case of
Indranil Mukherjee Vs. State of West Bengal reported
case of Sri Indranil Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
He has further submitted that the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta ... case of Sri Indranil Mukherjee (supra), the similar issue
brought up before the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court
wherein it was observed
case of Sri Indranil Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
He has further submitted that the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta ... case of Sri Indranil Mukherjee (supra), the similar issue
brought up before the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court
wherein it was observed