Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2691 (2.94 seconds)

Dr. Sudha Jain vs Madhya Pradesh Housingh & ... on 21 November, 2013

Sudha Jain and 16 others VERSUS M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE  DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS Counsel for Petitioner   Shri   Hemant   Shrivastava,  Advocate. Counsel   for   respondent   State ... 2013) Smt. Munni Jain VERSUS M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE  DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS Counsel for Petitioner   Shri   Deepak   Raghuvanshi,  Advocate. Counsel   for   respondent   State  Shri
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - S Yadav - Full Document

Shrishti Infrastructure Development ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 June, 2021

Shrishti Infrastructure Development ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 June, 2021 Author: Chief Justice Bench: Mohammad Rafiq , B.K. Shrivastava WP 10786/2021 ... PRADESH, AT JABALPUR (DIVISION BENCH) Writ Petition No.10786/2021 Shrishti Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited .....Petitioner Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others .......Respondents
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Sumanth And Company vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 15 September, 2011

providing infrastructural facilities and to maintain the water supply and sewage system, the Act was amended authorising the Board to collect infrastructure development charges ... incurred towards improvements to existing water supply and sewerage infrastructure facilities (Rs. in crores) Infrastructure development charges collected from the developers of Multistoried building

Babubhai Meghajibhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat & 3....Opponents on 30 March, 2017

date (COD) for development of sports activities in Gujarat which shall include training, nutrient food, sports medicine and development of infrastructure facilities for sports ... infrastructure unlike other infrastructure, is not a paying proposition for the investors to expect a return in their investment and that therefore, sports development being
Gujarat High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - R S Reddy - Full Document

Rajesh Bissa vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Others on 27 April, 2010

Gurjrat, R&B Department, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd, Karnataka State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KSIIDS), Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd, Government ... regard to this observation the position is that Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services, Infrastructure Development Corporation (IL&FS IDC), a subsidiary of Infrastructure Leasing
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Katira Construction Ltd vs Union Of India &

deduction of income from the eligible business and primarily pertains to infrastructure development. By adding the impugned explanation, the Legislature provided that that nothing contained ... business of developing infrastructure. Till introduction of the impugned amendment, deductions were available to all undertakings and enterprises executing infrastructure development projects
Gujarat High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next