Gujarat Maritime Board vs L&T; Infrastructure Development ... on 28 September, 2016
Equivalent citations: AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT ... GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD ... APPELLANT (S)
VERSUS
L&T INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS LTD. AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENT
JABALPUR
W.A. No.1550/2013
M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board
Vs.
Dr. Sudha Jain
W.A. No.1563/2013
M.P. Housing ... Infrastructure Development Board
Vs.
Dr. A. K. Chaurasia
W.A. No.1565/2013
M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board
Vs.
B. S. S. Parihar
Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus, the main challenge relates to demand of Infrastructure Development Charges (IDC) by the CMDA on behalf of CMWSSB; while in other ... unconstitutional. The above provisions do not prescribe any rate for Infrastructure Development Charges (IDC).
(b) The demand of IDC payable to CMWSSB has no nexus
Jaipur Ii Jaipur vs M/S Road Infrastructure Development ... on 14 May, 2018
Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman , Abhay Manohar Sapre
ITEM NO.31 COURT ... JAIPUR II JAIPUR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF RAJASTHAN LTD
Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION
contending that the assessee-Company is involved in
infrastructure development. The Assessing Authority
6
issued notice under Section 142(2) of the Act calling
upon ... infrastructure
facilities developed.
9. Further, the "Infrastructure Facility" is defined
under explanation to Section 80-IA(4) of the Act. The
infrastructure facility
writ petitions have been filed
by the Haryana State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'HSIIDC') assailing the correctness
Section 27 (3) of the 2002 Act, the
development fund is applied for the development of infrastructure sectors
by providing infrastructure facilities in the State ... deposited in the
development fund to be applied for the development of the infrastructure
sectors by providing infrastructure facilities in the State of Punjab
Rishima Sa Investments Llc (Mauritius) vs Shristi Infrastructure Development ... on 22 February, 2021
Author: Jyoti Singh
Bench: Jyoti Singh
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Chopra, Ms. Anshika Mishra &
Mr. Prabhav Shroff, Advocates
versus
SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit K. Mishra, Mr. Harshad
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)
LIMITEDV/S MEHAR SINGH AND OTHERS
33.
RFA - 5710 - HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
2015 CORPORATION,(NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ... INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)
LIMITEDV/S SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS
57.
RFA - 5682 - HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
2015 CORPORATION,(NOW HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
right in holding that the admission fee and contribution to infrastructure development fund paid by the assessee to become a member of the stock exchange ... infrastructure facilities for due conduct of the business of the stock broking and hence the amount paid towards Admission fee as well as Infrastructure Development
