Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 181 (2.46 seconds)

Sri Z M Chincholikar vs Karnataka Rural Infrastructure on 9 March, 2026

WORKING AT: WORKING AS INCHARGE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED, DAVANAGERE DIVISION, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577001 ...PETITIONER Digitally (BY SRI. RAVINDRA PRASAD B., ADVOCATE ... MADHURI S AND: Location: High Court of Karnataka 1. KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 4TH & 5TH FLOOR, GRAMEENAABHIVRUDHI BHAVANA
Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

Krishna Murthy. P vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2026

layout contributed towards urban infrastructure improvements. The BDA had already incurred significant expenses on land leveling, drainage formation, and other development works, spending crores ... this stage would cause irreparable harm to public planning and infrastructure development. Accordingly, we are of the view that the BDA's acquisition
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna Murthy. P vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2026

layout contributed towards urban infrastructure improvements. The BDA had already incurred significant expenses on land leveling, drainage formation, and other development works, spending crores ... this stage would cause irreparable harm to public planning and infrastructure development. Accordingly, we are of the view that the BDA's acquisition
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna Murthy. P vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2026

layout contributed towards urban infrastructure improvements. The BDA had already incurred significant expenses on land leveling, drainage formation, and other development works, spending crores ... this stage would cause irreparable harm to public planning and infrastructure development. Accordingly, we are of the view that the BDA's acquisition
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna Murthy. P vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2026

layout contributed towards urban infrastructure improvements. The BDA had already incurred significant expenses on land leveling, drainage formation, and other development works, spending crores ... this stage would cause irreparable harm to public planning and infrastructure development. Accordingly, we are of the view that the BDA's acquisition
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next