High Court in the case of M/s. L & T Infrastructure Development V ACIT
in TCA no 868 of 2009 dated 29.12.2022 wherein while ... given to the cost of road
infrastructure is concerned, we find that in L & T Infrastructure
Development Projects Ltd, the project cost has been
Road Infrastructure Development ... vs Jaipur I.. on 13 February, 2026
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
PRINCIPAL BENCH - COURT NO. - IV
Service ... Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (Appeals), Jaipur]
M/s. Road Infrastructure Development
Company of Rajasthan Limited (RIDCOR) ...Appellant
LIC Jeevan Nidhi Building, Ambedkar Circle
56177/2013 & 29 others
measures by drawing up suitable infrastructure
development programmes.‖
32. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, while examining the
constitutional validity ... levy of cess on land for raising
funds to implement infrastructure development projects
and environment improvement projects.
Whereas it is expedient to provide for additional
MhVhvkbZMhlh,y ¼Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. ½ }kjk
fd;k tk jgk gSA fcanq la[;k 7 dh lwpuk ds lanHkZ esa vihydrkZ ... visf{kr lwpuk gsrq MhVhvkbZMhlh,y ¼Delhi Transport
Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.½ dks fnukad 12-08-2024 dks fufnZ
Independent And Public Spirited Media ... vs Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 16 January, 2026
scheme of "Swaran Jayanti Haryana
Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme" significant change was
implemented and the receipt on account of EDC were required ... license, it had to pay External Development Charges for the infrastructural
development to the Govt of Haryana.
6.2 As per section
agreement entered into by the Appellant with the Punjab
Infrastructure Development Board ('PIDB/Authority').
4.1 The learned Counsel further submits that the entire ... agreement entered into between the Appellant
and the Authority under Punjab Infrastructure (Development &
Regulation) Act, 2002 ('PIDR Act') and submits that various
submitted that road
development work has been held to be an infrastructure development
work by the Gujarat High Court in the case of PCIT ... submission that the assessee
having done contract works in regard to infrastructure development as
required u/s 80IA(4) and the assessee is entitled
submitted that road
development work has been held to be an infrastructure development
work by the Gujarat High Court in the case of PCIT ... submission that the assessee
having done contract works in regard to infrastructure development as
required u/s 80IA(4) and the assessee is entitled
submitted that road
development work has been held to be an infrastructure development
work by the Gujarat High Court in the case of PCIT ... submission that the assessee
having done contract works in regard to infrastructure development as
required u/s 80IA(4) and the assessee is entitled
