noted that AoA, if proved against a stranger,
constitutes an intentional tort involving interference in the marital
relationship with the intent to draw one spouse ... Alienation of affection by a stranger, if proved, is an intentional
tort i.e. interference in the marital relationship with intent to alienate
one spouse
Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013
Equivalent citations: 2013 AIR
entering into such
a relationship, the Appellant has committed an intentional
tort, i.e. interference in the marital relationship with
intentionally alienating Respondent from ... vital importance.
Alienation of affection, in that context, is an intentional
tort, as held by this Court in Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal
case (supra), which gives
entering into such a relationship, the appellant
has committed an intentional tort, i.e. interference in the marital
relationship with intentionally alienating respondent from ... vital importance.
Alienation of affection, in that context, is an intentional tort, as
held by this Court in Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal case (supra),
which gives
entering into such a relationship, the appellant has
committed an intentional tort, i.e. interference in the marital
relationship with intentionally alienating respondent from ... vital
importance. Alienation of affection, in that context, is an intentional
tort, as held by this Court in Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal case (supra),
which gives
Alienation of affection by a stranger, if proved, is an intentional
tort i.e. interference in the marital relationship with intent to alienate
one spouse
United
States under the Sherman Anti Trust Act and for ‗intentional
tort'. The plea of the British Airways was that the procedure
Alienation of affection by a stranger, if proved, is an
intentional tort i.e. interference in the marital relationship with intent to
alienate one spouse
entering into such a relationship, the
appellant has committed an intentional tort i.e. interference in
the marital relationship with intentionally alienating the
respondent from ... vital
importance. Alienation of affection, in that context, is an
intentional tort, as held by this Court in Pinakin Mahipatray
Rawal case [ Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal
entering into such a relationship, the appellant has committed an
intentional tort, i.e. interference in the marital relationship with
intentionally
alienating respondent from ... vital importance.
Alienation of affection, in that context, is an intentional tort, as held by
this
Court in Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal case (supra), which gives
