mentioned at serial No.55 of the list. The
Society acted as intermediator between its Members and opposite
First Appeal No.1543 ... further allotment to the
complainant. Opposite party No.1-Society simply acted as
intermediator and no liability can be fastened on it. Possession
party no. 1 is in no way
held responsible for the Act of Intermediate Examination Board. I humbly submit
that the complaint filed ... loss their academic year due to negligent acts of
the opposite parties. The negligent acts
of the opposite parties came under deficiency in service
grounds of appeal and whether opposite party No.1
i.e. intermediate bank has negligently and
improperly kept the cheque in question ... were only
intermediate bank. As per section 77 of Negotiable
Instruments Act 1881 intermediate bank is legally liable for
laxity and non action within stipulated
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
afore-extracted provision of the Act, it is evident that only an appeal under Section 27A of the Act, is maintainable against the order, passed ... District Forum under Section 27 of the Act, whether it be a final, intermediate or interlocutory order. Such an order passed by the District Forum
