holding the said locker. Ld. Counsel has also argued that even if the
locker is assumed to be in the joint name, it is proved ... manipulation in the document. The Locker Opening Form, Ex. CW1/A
clearly shows that the locker was opened jointly in the name of plaintiff
operation of the said
locker was joint in nature only as instructed by the parties jointly. The said
locker was operational till the year ... obtaining indemnity and undertaking from claimants, locker
holders while operating the disputed lockers or resolving disputes qua the
lockers, have been instructed
property
sought to be released are :-
1. Key No. 24 of joint locker no.4 in Allahabad Bank,
Branch at E-2/60, Areara Colony ... ornaments contained in the
aforesaid locker;
2. To permit operation of Joint Locker No.4
3. To restore the operation of Savings Bank Account
locker key.
The Petitioner apprehends that the Locker may be opened and her
jewellery worth several lakhs would be removed from the Locker. The
Petitioner ... locker key. The Petitioner apprehends that the Locker may be
opened and her jewellery worth several lakhs would be removed from
the Locker. The Petitioner
income of the business
carried on from the said shop. A joint locker was maintained in the joint
name of the parents of the parties ... same alongwith jewellary of the wife of the plaintiff in the joint locker
operated upon by parents of the plaintiff. The father of the plaintiff
surviving legal heirs. It is stated that
there was one joint locker in the name of deceased Smt. Mohini
Budhiraja and Late Sh. Avtar Singh ... further proved the number of the joint locker no. 528 of the
deceased is with State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, Paschim Vihar
Branch, Delhi
that they made
false statements denying of having any locker either in individual names or
jointly in any bank. It later transpired that they ... whether they or any of them either individually or jointly did hold any
locker, the answer was in the negative. The accusation of the authorities
informed Plaintiff No. 3, that Defendant No. 1 had
opened a joint locker with Defendant No. 9 in false
names of Chandresh Sharma and Devendra ... Devkinandanji Maharaj had opened
Locker No. 412 bearing Registration No. 697 ("the
said locker") with Defendant No. 9 jointly under the
false name
about all this who
had already expired. She admitted having a joint locker with her sister,
namely, Meenakshi Sharma. She further admitted that her mother
total income of
the appellant found from the joint locker belonging to appellant and
his wife during the search considering the same as an unexplained ... added which was found from the joint locker belonging to the assessee and his
wife of the explanation of the assessee in respect of cash
