Article 19(1) have been infringed.
32. Kania, C. J. rejected this argument, inter alia, on these grounds:
(i) Argument would have been equally applicable ... succeeding Articles 20 and 21." (Page 192). In tune with Kania, C. J., the learned Judge observed: "A construction which would bring within
Article 19(1) have been infringed.
29. Kania, C J. rejected this argument, inter alia, on these grounds :
(i) Argument would have been equally applicable ... succeeding Articles 20 and 21." (Page 192). In tune with Kania, C.J., the learned Judge observed : "A construction which would bring within
SUPREME COURT 207
Author: Hiralal J. Kania
Bench: Hiralal J. Kania
PETITIONER:
R.R. CHARI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH.
DATE OF JUDGMENT ... 1951
BENCH:
KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ)
BENCH:
KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ)
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN
CITATION:
1951 AIR 207 1951 SCR 312
CITATOR
SUPREME COURT 174
Author: Hiralal J. Kania
Bench: Hiralal J. Kania , Saiyid Fazal Ali , B.K. Mukherjea , N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar
PETITIONER:
TARAPADA DE AND OTHERS ... STATE OF WEST BENGAL
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
25/01/1951
BENCH:
KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ)
BENCH:
KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ)
FAZAL ALI, SAIYID
SASTRI
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Equivalent
applicant is the wife. Mr. Sawant submitted that the view taken by Kania, J. in 79 Bom.L.R. 73, requires reconsideration ... were to accept the correctness of the view taken by Kania, J. on the true construction of section 25(1) , it will not have
SUPREME COURT 155, 1963 MADLW 878
Bench: Hiralal J. Kania , Saiyid Fazal Ali , Mehr Chand Mahajan , B.K. Mukherjea
PETITIONER:
DR. BABU RAM SAKSENA ... JUDGMENT:
05/05/1950
BENCH:
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI
BENCH:
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI
KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ)
FAZAL ALI, SAIYID
MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN
CHANDLR(CIV&CRI) 1
Author: M.H. Kania
Bench: M.H. Kania , Rangnath Misra
PETITIONER:
CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF AND ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
MAJOR ... CHADHA
DATE OF JUDGMENT21/12/1990
BENCH:
KANIA, M.H.
BENCH:
KANIA, M.H.
MISRA, RANGNATH (CJ)
CITATION:
1991 AIR 460 1990 SCR Supl
children even when he was entitled to their custody was considered by Kania J. in Bayabai v. Esmail Ahmed . In that case a Mahomedan unmarried ... living with her divorced mother, sued her father for separate maintenance. Kania J. observed (p. 825):
In my opinion the Mahomedan Law, like other systems
Code of Civil Procedure .
We respectfully differ from the opinion expressed by Kania J. in Kilachand Devchand and Co. V. Ajodhyaprasad Sukhanand ... could be enforced under Section 36, Civil P.C. Kania J. did not discuss the law, did not cite any authorities and simply made
