Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

S.Marimuthu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 14 March, 2019 Author: S.M

classification, discrimination cannot be allowed. It is also urged that petitioners legitimately expected that State Government shall honour the undertaking given before the Supreme Court ... State of A.P. ), decided on 8.5.1087. The plea of legitimate expectation is also pressed with reference to the judgments of Supreme Court

Dr Manohar Lal And 36 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on

therefore, the doctrine of promissory estoppel as well as the legitimate expectation would clearly apply to their case. 10. The following are the case laws ... raise the grounds of "promissory estoppel" and "legitimate expectation" under the facts and circumstances of the case? (v) Whether the appellants

University had conducted special examination, and as such, the petitioners also legitimately expected that special examination shall be conducted this year also. 13. Pursuant ... memory and future is a present expectation. For legal purposes, expectation is not same anticipation. Legitimacy of an expectation can be inferred only

Department to absorb the petitioners. (d) The doctrine of legitimate expectation would come into operation by the conduct of the TWAD Board ... regular and natural sequence. Such expectation should be justifiably legitimate and protectable. Every such legitimate expectation does not by itself fructify into a right

PETITIONER AND NOT TO OTHERS? FURTHER DOCTRINE OF PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL AND LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION APPLY TO THE PRESENT CASE. 58. If the averments in the Writ ... expectation does not require the fulfilment of the expectation where an overriding public interest requires otherwise. In other words where a person's legitimate

social context. However, law has evolved the doctrines of legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel to ensure that promises made by the Government, its officials ... fulfilled? Was that expectation generated by a representation made by the statutory authority (or service provider)? Was the expectation "legitimate"? Would

8808/2018 JUDGMENT can challenge such Circular under the doctrine of legitimate expectation. He submitted that the Circular or the Policy would apply to fresh ... Again the submission made on the basis of the estoppel and legitimate expectation are therefore devoid of merits. There is no question of any legitimate

writ jurisdiction. The doctrine of legitimate expectation has also some limits and restrictions. The expectation must be legitimate. The expectation loses all its legitimacy ... expectation does not require the fulfillment of the expectation where an overriding public interest requires otherwise. In other words where a person's legitimate