Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Revenue and against that order of the High Court no LPA is maintainable as this is not the original order. The Special Leave Petition

Corruption Act . The Supreme Court has repeatedly laid down that under LPA 810/2010 page 2 of 5 Prevention of Corruption Act order of framing ... petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are maintainable. LPA 810/2010 page 3 of 5 (d) Even if a petition under

controversy to rest by holding that such an LPA would not be maintainable. In view of the aforesaid decision, the LPA stands dismissed being ... wherein the question was whether LPA was maintainable or not and in that context, their Lordships, relying on the decision rendered in Resham Singh Pyara

Judges constituting the Division Bench differ in their opinion the LPA was maintainable and they could have decided on that day but as the same ... LPA, as our agreement or disagreement would have really the effect and impact on the decision of the LPA which in praesenti, is not maintainable

writ of certiorari, then against such an order an LPA would be maintainable. To put it explicitly clear, take a case where in a petition ... writ of certiorari, then against such an order an LPA would be maintainable. (xiii) A combined application under both Articles

which was allowed. The defendant preferred LPA No. 373/2010. While dealing with the LPA, the Division Bench LPA No.620/2011 page ... wherein the question was whether LPA was maintainable or not and in that context, Their Lordships, relying on the decision rendered in Resham Singh Pyara

writ of certiorari, then against such an order an LPA would be maintainable. To put it explicitly clear, take a case where in a petition ... writ of certiorari, then against such an order an LPA would be maintainable.  8 (xiii) A combined application under both Articles

aforesaid order came to be assailed in LPA No. 1426 of 2015. The Division Bench, by order dated 15.12.2015, without issuing notice to the present ... counsel, has raised a singular contention that the LPA preferred before the Division Bench was not maintainable inasmuch as the learned Single Judge had exercised

High Court of Delhi in Review Petition No.79 of 2009 in LPA No.1233 of 2006. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing ... special leave petition is not maintainable since the main judgment rendered by the High Court on 5.11.2008 in LPA No.1233

Board of Revenue. An LPA was preferred and the Division Bench dismissed the same holding that it was not maintainable on the premises that ... High Court also wrongly dismissed the LPA without noticing that an appeal would be maintainable if the writ petition was filed under Articles