Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Mantham Layman vs The State Of Telangana on 8 March, 2019 Author: A.Rajasheker Reddy Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan , A.Rajasheker Reddy

solicitor of this Court. 40. Now Mr. Hormusji Chichgur was a layman and never pretended to be a Pehlvi, Zend or Avesta scholar

tariff entry and that the entry should be read as the layman would road it. He has pleaded that as held in the case ... resin. He has pleaded that the term plastics as understood by the layman and in the trade should be made applicable to the entry under

solicitor of this Court. " 42. Now Mr. Hormusji Chichgur was a layman and never pretended to be a Pehlvi, Zend or Avesta scholar

become a complicated branch of law, and an ordinary layman cannot be expected to know this law. It may be mentioned that there ... provides that separation for two years is a ground for divorce. A layman would probably think that proof of two years of physical separation alone

become a complicated branch of law, and an ordinary layman cannot be expected to know this law. It may be mentioned that there ... provides that separation for two years is a ground for divorce. A layman would probably think that proof of two years of physical separation alone

area, counters etc. The work of measurement cannot be done by a layman infact it is skilled/ technical Page 21 of 41 (ANAND SWAROOP AGGARWAL ... this regard is that work of measurement cannot be done by a layman and infact it is a skilled / technical job. The depositions made

right to be heard by counsel. Even the intelligent and educated layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged ... foundation of that knowledge of law. No layman, educated or uneducated, can be expected to defend himself at a criminal trial, particularly, one involving complicated

underlying message therein viewed from the eyes of a common layman. Thus, the impugned advertisement, the intent therein, the manner thereof, and the message thereby ... will be the same when viewed through the eyes of a common layman. 51. It is pertinent to note that the defendant

those documents and it is further stated that the appellant being a layman was totally dependent upon his counsel and was not aware ... only ground taken by the appellant is that the appellant is a layman and it was the duty of the Ld.Counsel to lead proper