difference are referred to an arbitrator,
whether a lawyer or a layman, he is constituted the sole and final judge of
all questions both ... award being a decision of an arbitrator whether a lawyer or a layman
chosen by the parties, and entrusted with power to decide a dispute
were required to give reasons. The arbitrator may be a layman or a lawyer. In the Punjab decision he was a lawyer ... well be a layman. To say that a lay arbitrator must give reasons for his award when the statute does not require him will
difference are referred to an arbitrator,
whether a lawyer or a layman, he is constitut-
ed the sole and final judge of all questions
both
difference are
referred to an arbitrator, whether a
lawyer or a layman, he is constituted
the sole and final judge of all
questions both
could have
asked for it specifically, for he was
38
not a layman ignorant about the legal position but a
professional lawyer retained
difference are
referred to an arbitrator, whether a lawyer or
a layman, he is constituted the sole and final
judge of all questions both
could have asked for it
specifically, for he was not a layman ignorant about the
legal position but a professional lawyer retained by the
Government
award being a decision of an arbitrator whether a lawyer or a layman chosen by the parties, and entrusted with power to decide a dispute
Board Of Trustees Of Jawaharlal Nehru ... vs Three Circles Contractors on 1 April, 2015
Author
award being a decision of an arbitrator whether a
lawyer or a layman chosen by the parties, and entrusted
with power to decide a dispute
