Present vs By Advocates M/S S.Subhash Chand on 2 February, 2021
Present vs By Advocates M/S S.Subhash Chand on 2 February, 2021
Author: S
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 387 (0.76 seconds)Dr. Joseph Kuzhijalil vs Joseph Pulikunnel Alias P.S. Joseph And ... on 18 August, 1999
confined to cases of criminal contempt of Supreme Court or the High Court itself and criminal contempt of a subordinate Court is dealt with ... respectively cannot be restricted and trammelled by any ordinary legislation including the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act . Their inherent power is elastic, unfettered
State Of Kerala vs R. Sudarsan Babu And Ors. on 5 August, 1983
under
the orders of the said Legislative As
sembly, a reprimand of Keshav Singh
for having committed contempt of the
House and also for having ... them by Keshav Singh, that the resolution adopted by the Legislative Assembly amounted to contempt of court and since it was wholly without jurisdiction
A. Mayilswami vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 13 July, 1995
Contempt of Courts Act is applicable only in respect of contempt of subordinate courts and it has no application in cases of contempt of High ... respectively cannot be restricted and trammelled by any ordinary legislation including the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act . The Supreme Court further observed that
The Chief Secretary To Government vs Khalid Mundappilly on 13 August, 2010
place to mention about the contempt case pending
in this Court against an Ex-MLA of the political party which is leading
the coalition Government ... produced Annexure A1
newspaper cutting which led to the contempt proceedings against the
said ex-MLA. What is stated in Annexure A1 series is that
M. Chacko vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 1983
purpose of this case. This section deals with prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences ... regard to offences affecting administration of justice or contempt of lawful authority ; the legislative object is to reduce to the minimum the possibility of purposeless
P.Rahim vs M.V.Jayarajan on 12 October, 2010
motu cognizance
indicate a legislative intention to debar the High Court from
taking cognizance in that mode of any criminal contempt of a
subordinate court ... taken away by a legislation, such authority of this Court can
be regulated by an appropriate law - the Contempt of Courts Act and
the Rules
Jomon Puthenpurackal vs Judicial 1St Class Magistrate-Iii on 17 November, 2003
second respondent in this petition, who is the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Kerala, for production of documents. It is stated that the summons ... Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.
3. Petitioner filed an application under Section 15(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act (hereinafter referred
Balakrishna Pillai vs Balachandran on 29 September, 2000
Petitioner in this contempt case, R. Balakrishna Pillai, is a former Minister and is a Member of Kerala Legislative Assembly. He is an accused ... Contempt of Courts Act . What is alleged is civil contempt under S. 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act. Civil contempt means willful disobedience
Shri C.N. Presannan, Judl. Second Class ... vs Shri K.A. Mohammed Ali, Adv. on 14 March, 1991
Contempt jurisdiction date backs to the 12th century. Its manifestations are indeed many and varied. There have been discussions even about the phrase 'contempt ... requirements are preserved". The developments in legislation, including the recommendations of the Phillimore Committee and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1981 in England, would