inquiries
into collateral matters which may be necessary for the
purpose, legislative or otherwise, of those particular
matters. We are unable, therefore,to hold that ... these two entries
is, in its scope or ambit, limited to future legislative
purposes only.
Learned counsel then takes us through the different heads
will be actionable by way
of disciplinary action as well as contempt.
The above directions are prospective.”
2. This Court, while passing the judgment under ... view to
enforce fundamental rights which may sometimes be perceived as
legislative in nature. Such directions can certainly be issued and
continued till an appropriate
Constitution permitting state legislatures to legislate on subjects like Criminal law, Criminal Procedure and Evidence would become meaningless as legislation by the legislature ... that the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply in matters of contempt triable bv the High Court. The High Court can deal with
Constitution permitting state legislatures to legislate on subjects like Criminal law, Criminal Procedure and Evidence would become meaningless as legislation by the legislature ... that the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply in matters of contempt triable by the High Court. The High Court can deal with
A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988
Equivalent citations
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Equivalent
Bachan Singh vs State Of Punjab on 9 May, 1980
Equivalent citations: (1982)3SCC24, [1983
Rajendra Prasad Etc. Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 February, 1979
Equivalent citations
State Of Haryana vs Mahender Singh & Ors on 2 November, 2007
Author: S.B
V. C. Shukla vs State (Delhi Administration) on 11 April, 1980
Equivalent citations: 1980 AIR
