defendants would hit by the doctrine of lispendens. Hence, the suit has been filed for partition and separate possession.
3. The 1st defendant resisted ... favour of 2nd and 3rd defendants is hit by the doctrine of lispendens.
11. The learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of his above
insufficient stamps and the same is hit by the doctrine of lispendens and sought the dismissal of the suit.
4. Considering the oral as well ... plaintiffs is hit by the doctrine of lispendens and not binding on the defendant. The counsel also contended that the suit was originally filed only
B. Neelakanta vs The Commissioner on 1 September, 2015
IN THE COURT OF THE LII
Punjab and Hariyana 211.
Mr. Mantha further submits that the doctrine of lispendens
is applicable to the facts of this case and the alienation
Punjab and Hariyana 211.
Mr. Mantha further submits that the doctrine of lispendens
is applicable to the facts of this case and the alienation
interest of the intervener-applicants is protected by the provisions of
lispendens and further by the provisions contained in Order 23 Rule
Britannia Industries Limited ... vs ) Mr.A.K.Hirjee on 21 September, 2015
Govt. Of Karnataka
