Venkataramana Udupa vs Kannan Chettiar on 24 May, 1962
provisions conferring upon members of a certain class great privileges in litigation. The section confers upon a person who is shown to be a member
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 365 (0.03 seconds)Law Society Of India vs Fertilizers And Chemicals Travancore ... on 14 February, 1994
sealed cover.
29. Counsel for the first respondent submitted that to claim privilege in respect of a document directed to be produced by the court ... finding that there is no reason to claim privilege to produce it in this litigation. We have also said in that order that the third
Mrs.Rajamma Joseph vs Mr.Binu Prasad on 22 December, 2009
court fee. If a plaintiff seeks such a special
privilege to pursue his litigation, is there any
reason not to insist on his strictly complying
Andrews vs Hassan on 14 July, 2006
court fee. If a plaintiff seeks such a special privilege to pursue his litigation, is there any reason not to insist on his strictly complying
Droupathy vs Sri.Kesavan on 16 July, 2009
litigation but an
outside agency, such as the tax Collecting
authorities of the Government, which proceeds
against the subject matter of litigation, without
anything done ... parties to the litigation, such right, privilege
or advantage may be waived by the party in
whose favour the provision of law stands
Jagadamma vs Unknown on 7 May, 2021
Kapoor (AIR 1972 SC 2379) that an immunity from a
litigation unless the requisite court fee is paid ... court fee. If a plaintiff seeks
such a special privilege to pursue his litigation, is there
any reason not to insist on his strictly complying
Ravi (Ravi N.R.) vs Shiny on 9 July, 2013
court fee. If a plaintiff seeks such a special
privilege to pursue his litigation, is there any reason not to
insist on his strictly complying
C.K. Rajan vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 10 January, 1994
C.K. Rajan vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 10 January, 1994
Equivalent citations
Jagadhi @ Sreedharamenon vs R. Surendramenon on 16 February, 2024
matters connected to their
community, that amounts to denial of right and privilege to
which they are entitled as a members of the Nair community ... matter of civil litigation and only to
wreak vengeance, this prosecution was initiated without any
basis.
8. Denial of right and privilege of a person
South Travancore Distilleries And ... vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 September, 2005
that portion of its turnover
which comprises of excise duty/privilege price in respect of the
sale of IMFL. The petitioner essentially has two contentions ... liability, during the
pendency of litigation on the issue of whether the amounts
collected by way of privilege price by the Kerala State Beverages
Corporation