A.K. Bose vs Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on 1 February, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIR
obligations, which form the subject-matter of all Judicial proceedings. If the privilege did not exist at all every one would be thrown upon ... privilege and not the privilege of the confidential agent) that he should be enabled properly to conduct his litigation. That is the meaning
being conducted by Tamil Nadu State Marketing
Corporation Limited (TASMAC) and the privilege of retail vending was being
conferred on the individuals on application ... given to remit the whole of the privilege amount
by 31.07.2002 for entitling the renewal. Therefore, litigation
case in
England, if no absolute privilege existed there,
since the risk of vexatious and often ruinous
litigation in India is far greater ... larger risks of
spiteful litigation. If it be said that conversely,
the risk of the abuse of an absolute privilege is
also greater, I should
subject-matter of the litigation, it is imperative that in the suit against the real parties to that litigation, the plaintiff should take the precaution ... suit. A fortiori if certain rights and privileges are granted to a party to such a litigation by the beneficial provisions of a statute, then
this question, claiming privilege and the learned fourth assistant judge of the City Civil Court has upheld the claim of privilege.
I am afraid that ... once be seen that the claim of privilege on behalf of the party to a litigation, in this form, is erroneous and proceeds
privilege or advantage to any of the parties to the litigation, such right, privilege or advantage might be waived by a party in whose favour
approach Court on their own, for example,
the differently abled, the under privileged, children, or may
be even the general public, the Court intervenes ... patent illegality. However,
this Court cannot in a public interest litigation take over
executive functions of the State. Nor can this Court sit in
appeal
elaborately referred to the previous
litigation on the issue pertaining to remittance of the sale amount on privileged
guideline value as on the date
addressed, and which the court decided, was whether the costs of the litigation were incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning the income ... defending the litigation was not only to secure his office of director but also to secure the privileges attributable to that office. It was said