acting alone could create a new privilege, claimed to be the sole and exclusive judges of their own privileges. There seemed to be thus complete ... their right in principle to decide all questions of privilege arising in litigation before them with certain large exceptions in favour of parliamentary jurisdiction
application
requires to be rejected. It is unfortunate that the nature of
litigation is totally of a different kind and passing of the order ... applicant appellant. If Heni has any
individual privilege or right whatsoever, then the course of
litigation would be different and the applicant at least cannot
defending the litigation was not only to secure his fees as a director but also to secure the right and privileges appertaining to such office ... enter into the motives of Sir Purshottamdas why he fought this litigation... and as no other purpose appears on the fact of the record
privilege of maintaining a pauper suit is a personal privilege granted to people who have no means of carrying on or continuing litigation
client. Instructions to counsel or legal advisers are also privileged documents.
14. No doubt the privilege afforded under the aforesaid provisions to a legal adviser ... litigation or the death of the parties.
15. It may also be mentioned that a failure on the part of the client to claim privilege
permitted can file written statement within 30 days is not the privileged period and the ld. Presiding Judge even has jurisdiction to reject the application ... bearing in a hotly contested litigation or any other urgent or sensitive matter. The third period is exclusively privileged period i.e. period beyond
erect a
building can keep his privilege in abeyance for some time
presupposing the scope of some litigation. There is no need to
discuss several
small
group of Government workers have been deprived of such
rights and privileges. Their voice is too feeble. Their future
too uncertain for want ... this stage, the Court in the arena of
public interest litigation, comes into picture.
Page 1 of 8
C/WPPIL/244/2014 ORDER
Shah Jolly Chandravadan And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 15 July, 2002
which occurred in Gujarat and is the subject of public interest litigation before us. The doctrine has been explained by Supreme Court relying on several ... State to protect and take into custody the rights and privileges of its citizens for discharging its obligations. The Constitution makes it imperative
