till
the first week of May, when the government had ordered a
lockdown in the city, the store/business of the defendant continued
with ... first week of May 2020, when there was a lockdown in the
city.
14. The defendant has denied any false or unilateral
interpretation
mature termination of the lease agreement on account of
imposition of lockdown. Defendant in such circumstances, as
stated, was entitled to avoid the lease agreement ... destruction of property.
* That temporary non use of the premises due to lockdown
which was announced due to Covid-19 Pandemic cannot be
construed
part of the Plaintiff.
2.8 Upon relaxation of the nationwide lockdown, owing to the
crisis of COVID-10 pandemic, the Plaintiff duly submitted its
insurance ... unreasonably repudiated the Plaintiff's claim
by unfairly using the mandatory lockdown closure (22.03.2020 -
07.05.2020) against the plaintiff. The grounds for rejection were
frivolous
again had written
another email to the defendant intimating that a Nationwide
lockdown has been imposed by the Government and the Custom
office is also ... further submitted that in the last week of March, 2020
Nationwide lockdown was imposed by the Government of India
and for the reasons the process
stating that since the plaintiff had
refused to waive the rent during lockdown period, the defendants
are vacating the premises on 30.08.2020. In the said ... prevented
access to the suit property since 24.03.2020 because of
nationwide lockdown by the Government of India as per
circulars/ notifications issued by the Ministry
stating that since the plaintiff had
refused to waive the rent during lockdown period, the defendants
are vacating the premises on 30.08.2020. In the said ... prevented
access to the suit property since 24.03.2020 because of
nationwide lockdown by the Government of India as per
circulars/ notifications issued by the Ministry
times, on account of which the
Government of India imposed a National Lockdown w.e.f.
24.03.2020. That even before the imposition of the National ... Lockdown by the Government of India and keeping in mind the
health and safety of its staff members and customers, defendant
No.1 being
plaintiff had cleared all its dues till March
2020 and due to lockdown from 25.03.2020 for period of about 6
months, the plaintiff had made ... between the parties till January 2021 due to
force majeure condition of lockdown due to COVID 19 as
mentioned in Clause 13 of the said
plaintiff had cleared all its dues till March
2020 and due to lockdown from 25.03.2020 for period of about 6
months, the plaintiff had made ... between the parties till January 2021 due to
force majeure condition of lockdown due to COVID 19 as
mentioned in Clause 13 of the said
till
the first week of May, when the government had ordered a
lockdown in the city, the store/business of the defendant continued
with ... first week of May 2020, when there was a lockdown in the
city.
17. The defendant has denied any false or unilateral
interpretation
