applicant on 17.2.2020. However, thereafter on account of Covid-19 pandemic lockdown was imposed and the entire work has been stopped. After relaxation, the court ... concerned, it is a common fact known to all and each that lockdown in the country was imposed in March, 2020. The order granting indulgence
from 2018 to 2021. He also continued the aforesaid market during the lockdown period on account of COVID-19 pandemic. Learned counsel for the applicant ... submits that the applicant did not hold any such market during the lockdown period. He further submits that vide order dated 26.10.2021, the Uttar Pradesh
found selling rice meant for distribution for the poor people during the lockdown period,
secretly through the fair price shop belonging to the petitioner ... rice could
not be distributed amongst few beneficiaries due to the prevailing lockdown situation in view
of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference is made
However, ld. MM failed to
appreciate that since 25.03.2020 till 05.05.2020, lockdown was
declared and in that case , revisionist was not in a position ... appear
before the trial court on 30.04.2020. From 25.03.2020, a lockdown
had ensued and therefore, the courts were not functioning and the
revisionist could
order dated 07.05.2019 of the
learned Magistrate.
2. On account of Covid19 lockdown, hearing in
court was not possible so learned counsel for revisionist ... mind the
suspension of work in the courts due to Covid-19 lockdown.
Revision file be consigned to record room.
Announced through video conferencing
those members of the Bar, who are facing financial distress due to
Lockdown and restrictive functioning of the courts owing to ongoing
Covid-19 pandemic
those members of the Bar, who are facing financial distress due to
Lockdown and restrictive functioning of the courts owing to ongoing
Covid-19 pandemic
order reads thus:
"Looking to impediments in arranging sureties because of lockdown, while invoking powers under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution ... been released due to non-availability of sureties as a consequence to lockdown may be released on executing personal bond as ordered by the Court
amount. He has to collect it from his clients. During COVID-19 lockdown,
there had been delay in payments from the clients of the Petitioner ... contention of the learned Counsel
for the Petitioner that during covid-19 lockdown the entire world had been
suffering economically. Here also the Petitioner
Page 6 of 16
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
10.03.2020, whereafter, a lockdown was announced by the
government and the said Neelam Chauhan neither paid ... return the same. The
complainant has submitted that after the lockdown was lifted, she
started pursuing Neelam Chauhan to either pay or return the jewellery
