Rakhi vs Usha Gujral, Lucknow on 8 October, 1968
Equivalent citations: ILR1969DELHI9
Author: I.D. Dua
Bench: I.D. Dua
JUDGMENT ... lays stress on the submission that the husband has settled down in Lucknow and that there is no question of his coming to Delhi
appellate order or
the revisional order which came to be passed at Lucknow, then
Lucknow bench would have jurisdiction though the original order
was passed ... Nasiruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal
(supra), the Appellate Tribunal at Lucknow, pursuant to the orders
passed in Writ Petition No.750/1964
decide the suit since cause of action arose to the plaintiff in Lucknow and one of the conditions of the contract was that jurisdiction will ... Bangalore Metropolitan City, suit ought to have been filed either at Lucknow or at Bangalore. The application is contested by the plaintiff.
(5) Having heard
appellate order or the revisional order
which came to be passed at Lucknow then Lucknow would
have jurisdiction though the original order was passed ... part at a place within the
specified Oudh areas, the Lucknow Bench will have
jurisdiction. If the cause of action arises wholly within the
specified
residence to Property No.3, Survey No.105,
Nehru Road, Cantonment, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh which
should be taken as a record for service ... informed that she had shifted her residence to 3,
Nehru Road, Cantonment, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh where the
Notice should now be delivered
stated that the petitioner was living alone with her husband permanently at Lucknow. The petitioner's husband was stated to be carrying on business ... Lucknow under the name and style of Hind Shoe Company. He was filing income-tax returns of his business at Lucknow. The respondent denied that
probation by the Respondent as a
faculty in Physics at its Lucknow Centre. He states that he joined the
Respondent‟s Lucknow Centre on 20th ... residing
at a tenanted accommodation at 302, Shriram Apartments, New Berry Road,
Lucknow and had his old house at 120/1 Beladari Lane Indra Khan
hereinafter called the petitioner) against U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow (hereinafter called the respondent).
2. The case of petitioner is that in pursuance ... disputed on the ground that cause of action wholly arose at Lucknow and not at Delhi, where the respondent's head office is situated
petitioner he has been working as Assistant Development Officer in Sahkarita Bhawan, Lucknow. Both Surinder and Pushpa after marriage resided at House ... Lane No. 2 Pawanpuri, Sujanpura, Alambagh, Lucknow. It appears that the relations between the first petitioner and Pushpa soured with the result Pushpa came back
court record already spawned by the litigation between the parties,
3. In Lucknow there is a cinema called 'Shilpi Theatre! It is owned ... construct a cinema on a plot, of land at 11 Cantonment Road, Lucknow, which was owned by Ram Swarup Rastogi and his wife.
4. Probably
