Union Of India (Uoi) vs South India Corporation Madras ... on 17 October, 1959
Equivalent citations: AIR1960AP346, AIR 1960 ANDHRA PRADESH 346, (1960) 1 ANDH ... ANDH PRA 346
JUDGMENT
Ansari, J.
1. Messrs. South India Corporation (Madras) Private Ltd., the respondent in these Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and Revision Petition
Excise and Gold (Control) Tribunal (for short 'CROAT'), South Regional Bench, Chennai consequent on the allowing of the above appeal by the CEGAT ... Customs, Excise, Gold (Control) Tribunal (CEGAT), South Regional Bench, Chennai setting aside the order in Appeal
Riverside (Bhatpara) Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT , CIT v. South Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. , CIT v. Saharanpur Electric Supply Company
Chennai and others and
Indian Bank v. M/s. Nippon Enterprises South, Chennai and
others of Madras High Court, Pushpangadan v. Federal Bank
Limited ... Chidambaranars Case
(Supra 14), M/s. Nippon Enterprises South, Chennais Case (Supra
15), Pushpangadans Case ( Supra 16), , Sanjeev Bansals Case
( Supra 17), Tara Chands Case
Copy to the Jt.Chief Controller of Explosives, Govt. of India, South Circle, Chennai (Licensing Authority) with a request to cancel the Licence bearing ... safety certificate no doubt other documents, the Chief Controller of Explosives, South Circle, Chennai, has issued licence No. A.P.5044 dated
Drug Inspector in Central Drugs Standard of Government of India at South Zone, Madras and he notified as Drugs Inspector on 08.03.1991 and he lodged ... that on 14.01.1991, he had received sample from the Drug Inspector, South Zone, Madras and the nature of the sample received are paper cartoons
Rahim Khan Sahib 1971 ACJ 295 (Madras) and South India Ins. Co. Ltd. v. P. Subramanium 1972 ACJ 439 (Madras). For reasons stated above, with
examination of the doctor and the Deputy Controller of Explosives, South Central, Madras is fatal to the prosecution case. Though, apparently the motive
CISF Unit, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant at Visakhapatnam, Deputy Inspector General, South Zone, Chennai (respondent No. 3 herein) vide his order dated 26.5.1998 transferred the petitioner
respondent by the Chief Engineer, M.E.S., South Zone, Madras respondent 2 herein, as illegal and void; and in turn to accept the tender
