Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. South Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. In that case the question was whether overhead

Madras High Court considered these provisions in CIT v. South Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. [1977] 109 ITR 426, where the Tribunal had taken

Calcutta High Courts decisions in the cases of CIT v. South Madras Electric Supply Corpn. Ltd. [1977] 109 ITR 426 and Riverside (Bhatpara) Electric Supply

case of Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Madras .v. South India Flour Mills (P) Ltd. (reported ... case of Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Madras .v. South India Flour Mills (P) Ltd. (cited supra), particularly paragraphs 12 to 15 thereof

situated in Manimangalam Village, Tambaram Sub Registration District, South Chennai Registration District Sriperumanthur Taluka, Chengai MGR District, within the jurisdiction of Padappai Sub Registrar Office

Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090 3. Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai South Commissionerate, having office at 13th and 15th ... 2019.(J).doc 5. Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate having his office at 5th Floor, 692 M.H.U. Complex

Madras High Court considered these provisions in CIT v. South Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. [1977] 109 ITR 426, where the Tribunal had taken

Ambika Tobacco Company, Gondia vs Labour Court, Nagpur And Ors. on 17 March, 1967 Equivalent

standing orders of the Boards Revenue. Eventually in 1908, the Madras Legislature passed the Madras Estates Land Act . No. 1 of 1908, which was later ... these feature of land held as ryotwari pattadar in the south Canara districts of madras are analogous to the rights and liabilities of an occupants

brought by the plaintiff in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of South Canara on November 25, 1913, as the karnavan, or Manager ... dissimilar conditions, the other decided by the High Court of Madras from South Canara, in both of which the identical question arising in the present