view of Misc. Order No. 261/2000 passed by the South Zonal Bench at Chennai. The circumstances which led to that order are as follows ... view that these two appeals are to be heard by South Zonal Bench at Chennai in the interest of justice. Learned Counsel representing the appellant
Seshavataram, Bangaru Muralidhar, Bangaru Manikyam v. CIT
10. South Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. v. First ITO Tiruchirapalli
11. V. Govindraju Chetty v. CTO, Hassan
Union of India
5. 1998 (102) E.L.T. 13 (Madras) - South India Structural Corpn. Ltd. v. A.C.C.E., Madras
This case was referred to the Larger Bench by South Zonal Bench at Chennai for resolving the conflict in the views expressed ... Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Chennai and he referred the matter to the Larger Bench to decide whether penalty
also placed by the learned DR on a decision of South Zonal Bench, Chennai in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. CCE, Cochin ... decision of the South Regional Bench (Chennai). As in the case of Section 35 under Section 35-G also the application is required
submitted that even for the period after March 1988, the Madras High Court in South India Structural Corporation Ltd. v. ACCE reported ... amount to manufacture. It was submitted that this judgment of the Madras High Court was binding on this Tribunal even though the jurisdiction of that
Referring Bench, is the one rendered by the South Zonal Bench (Chennai) in ACC Ltd. v. CCE , 1999 (108) ELT 477 wherein it was held
South India Sugar Limited v. Collector Central Excise, Madras 1987 Vol. 12 ECR 868. It has been held by the Tribunal in the said decisions ... South India Sugar Limited v. Collector of Central Excise, Madras 1987 (12) ECR 866.
It has been held by the Tribunal in the said decisions
Bangalore , 1995 (61) ECR 637 (Tribunal), the South Regional Bench at Madras while disposing of the Stay Applications had referred the matter ... authority.
When the matter came up before the South Regional Bench of the Tribunal at Madras for disposal of the stay applications, relying upon
works contract."
FACTORIES ACT:
CMP 2081/82 dated 3-8-84 (Madras) (Dr. P.S.S. Sundra Rao v. Inspector of Factories, Vellore - Judgment ... bullock cart parts at site held not a factory."
Madras High Court - The South India Floor Mills
