Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 82 (0.54 seconds)

Venkidusamy vs Karupusamy

alternative cart-track to make an inference possible that the suit cart-track should not have been the mamool cart-track referred ... existence of an alternative cart-track and the finding that the suit cart-track was not the mamool cart-track referred to in the documents

Sengodam vs O.V.Muthuramalingam

mention about the existence of cart-track. If at all there is any cart-track, the same should be mentioned in the earlier partition deed ... cart-track was in existence prior to the partition deed dated 14.05.1992 and in Ex.A1, a cart-track has been mentioned as “Mamool
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - K Ramasamy - Full Document

Perumayee vs Jayarama Gounder on 3 February, 1995

seeking the relief of mandatory injunction for the restoration of the mamool cart track, which was in existence, having been obliterated by the defendant ... easement in their favour and that apart, the said cart track was the only cart track, through which ingress and egress could be made
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next