issue of the debate... Ayodhya Verdict
delivered, Why Kashi-Mathura issue left unresolved?... asking
Hindu Priests!”. The petitioner as per the transcript had then
declaimed ... analyse the legal position of Kashi Mathura
issue...Hindu Priest organisation has reached Supreme
Court against Places of Worship (Special Provisions)
Act, 1991 ...According
accused Ram Niwas
Singh alias Chhaila Singh and Mathura Singh alias Vijai
Bahadur Singh surrendered themselves in court and were
sent to jail ... Investigating Officer filed a charge-
sheet against 15 persons, namely Mathura Singh, Ram
Sajiwan, Udai Bhan Singh, Ram Niwas Singh, Suraj Pal
Singh, Banwari, Lavkush
stated the prosecution case, as noticed by
the High Court is that Mathura was called to the
Police Station through Head Constable Ram Ujagar
with ... theft. As due
3
to the torture and electric shocks, condition of
Mathura deteriorated, he was released on 11th
October, 1983. According to the prosecution
Mathura Prasad Son Of Raghubir Sahaya ... vs State Of U.P. And Anurudd Kumar Son Of Sri ... on 25 August, 2006
Bench: S. Rafat Alam
Singh, who were being detained in the district jail Mathura under warrants issued to the jail authorities by the Sub-divisional Magistrate Chhata.
The circumstances ... petitioner Shravan Kumar Gupta are members of the District Hind Kisan Panchayat, Mathura or the District Socialist Party of Mathura. These two parties decided
Court against the Special Manager, Court of Wards, Sitapur incharge Rampur Mathura estate (Criminal Misc. Appln. No. 479 of 1951) and other two are applications ... rise to these applications may be briefly stated as follows:
2. Rampur Mathura estate and Kapurthala estate in Avadh are separated by the river Gogra
Mathura Dass vs State Of Punjab And Anr. on 15 February, 1977
Equivalent citations: (1977)79PLR362
JUDGMENT
Kulwant Singh Tiwana, J.
1. The appellant ... Mathura Dass, along with Hari Singh and his wife, Surjit Kaur, were the directors of Amar Hire Purchase (Private) Limited. The Punjab and Haryana High
under Section 399 of the Indian Penal Code was drawn up by Mathura, accused No. 1. The informer, having arrived the party started ... Superintendent of Police Mr. Ghose accompanied by Inspector Habibar Rahaman. Mathura remained behind as he was not quite well. On the way the Superintendent
Mathura Prosad Rajgharia vs Kanailal Mullick And Ors. on 22 June, 1967
Equivalent citations: AIR1968CAL170
JUDGMENT
T.P. Mukherji, J.
1. This is an appeal
section ¾ of D.P. Act , P.S. Raya, district Mathura, and for that end has questioned the sustainability of orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board ... Mathura,dated 16.3.2011 and also by lower appellate court/Sessions Court Mathura in Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 2011, Pushpendra @ Brij Bihari @ Pappi Vs. State
