Pappu Yadav @ Mitrasen vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home & ... on 4 March, 2020
Bench: Anil Kumar , Virendra Kumar Srivastava
HIGH COURT ... Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 6459 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pappu Yadav @ Mitrasen
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home & Others
Counsel for Petitioner
sufficient to take cognizance.
Same view was expressed in case of Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P. Reported
sufficient to take cognizance."
(emphasis added)
25. In Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (69) ACC 540, Court said that
sufficient to take cognizance."(emphasis added)
25. In Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (69) ACC 540, Court said that
sufficient to take cognizance."
(emphasis added)
26. In Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (69) ACC 540, Court said that
sufficient to take cognizance."
(emphasis added)
25. In Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (69) ACC 540, Court said that
others Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (69) ACC 540 Mitrasen Yadav Vs. State of U.P.
Learned AGA has not disputed the contention ... sufficient to take cognizance." The same view was expressed in Mitrasen Yadav's case (supra) in which it was held that
left.
MR. CHAIRMAN: We can extend the time.
Now, Shri Mitrasen Yadav. Kindly conclude within a minute. You conclude early so that we can finish
Naveen, PW6 Sh. Krishan, PW7 Sh. Manish Gulati, PW8 Sh.
Mitrasen, PW9 HC Rajinder Singh, PW10 Sh. Ankit, PW11 Dr. Kiran,
SC No.47/2014 ... PW29 Ct. Ravinder Singh, PW30 Ct. Harbhajan, PW31Ct. Ravinder,
PW32 SI Meena Yadav, PW33 Dr. V. Shankar Narayanan, Sr. Scientific
Officer, PW34 Dr. Dinesh Yadav
Discussion On The Motion Of Thanks On The President'S Address Moved By Shri
