Page No.27,
MOU dated 29.6.2000, (Annexure R-1) that the said MOU is quite a rough paper,
unsigned and we also observe ... left blank. In our view such document cannot
be treated as MOU. Similarly, on page 30 of the reply there is something written
in handwriting
date of 20.03.2020, and the deed remains
unsigned by the Suspended Director, just like the MoU dated
18.08.2015 which suggests that both documents were created
date of 20.03.2020, and the deed remains
unsigned by the Suspended Director, just like the MoU dated
18.08.2015 which suggests that both documents were created
should not have relied upon
the contents of an unsigned Memorandum of Understanding ('MoU' in short) as
admission of debt. Though
should not have relied upon
the contents of an unsigned Memorandum of Understanding ('MoU' in short) as
admission of debt. Though
photo copy of MOU which had
not seen the light of the day and he took over entire company by filing unsigned
resignation ... NCLT on the
ground that as per the MOU, a loan was taken by Shiv Raj Singh, which if
remained unpaid, then Shiv Raj Singh
photo copy of MOU which had
not seen the light of the day and he took over entire company by filing unsigned
resignation ... NCLT on the
ground that as per the MOU, a loan was taken by Shiv Raj Singh, which if
remained unpaid, then Shiv Raj Singh
contract between the Appellant and the Corporate
Debtor with respect to the MoU dated 26.08.2021, claim of Rs 41.30 lakhs
Page 5 of 19
Company ... Insolvency) No. 1908 of 2024
made by the Appellant under this MoU was not admissible. Even the claim
of Marketing Fees arising
Devas Multimedia Private Limited ... vs Antrix Corporation Limited on 8 September, 2021
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW
Major Atul Dev Retd & Ors vs Union Of India Mca & Ors on 21
