said Mutation Case. The Tahasildar by his
order dated 8.3.1983 disallowed the said Mutation Case. Maku
Mallik preferred Mutation Appeal No. 8 of 1983 before ... prefer any appeal for two years and finally on 1.12.1993, an
appeal was filed which was numbered as Mutation Appeal No. 42
of 1993 under
passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 14, Varanasi in Mutation Appeal No. 133 of 2014 (Samaj Sangathan vs. Nagar Nigam and others).
4. Both ... filed any objection to the mutation application preferred by the petitioners before the Nagar Ayukt, straightway preferred a mutation appeal against the order dated
mutated in the name of
Hindu Ahir father of plaintiff vide Mutation Succession Case No. 13
R2/60-61 and the mutation so allowed ... concerned mutation case was bearing case no. 245 of
1987-88 which was decided on 16.07.1987 by the Circle Officer, Gumla
and Mutation Appeal
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
read with
Paragraph-111 of the Mutation Manual.
In all these cases, the orders passed in different
mutation appeals are impugned.
2. For convenience ... appeal being Mutation Appeal No.160/2023
before the Sub-Collector, Jagatsinghpur. Said appeal was
allowed. Challenging such order passed in Mutation
Appeal, the present
