Fundamental Rights. In the case of University of Madras v. Santa Bai , the Madras High Court evolved the principle of ejusdem generis ... India Rajasthan High Court and in Devrajiah v. B. Padmana of Madras High Court, the court defined the word untouchability.The court said that
Singh, Chief Justice of the
High Court of Patna as Chief Justice of the High Court of Madras with
effect from the date he assumed ... Madras High Court
as the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court and Mr. Justice K. B. N. Singh,
Chief Justice of Patna High Court
Singh, Chief Justice of the High Court of Patna as Chief Justice of the High Court of Madras with effect from the date he assumed ... Madras High Court as the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court and Mr. Justice K.B.N. Singh, Chief Justice of Patna High Court
decided by the High Court of Madras nor sit in judgment on the order of Madras High Court dated ... Only under the orders of Madras High Court dated 12-10-1998 Radharani was sent back to Tirupathi with adequate police protection. Radharani had availed
High Court relies on the order dated 12.02.2010 passed by this Court between N.Velayutham and another v. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai ... said High Court, including proceedings in its Admiralty, Vice-Admiralty, testamentary intestate and matrimonial jurisdiction, respectively: Provided always that the said High Court shall
Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104. So petitioner request was rejected in Hon'ble Chief Justice at Madras High Court, Chennai - 104. Therefore respondent ... Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104. So petitioner request was rejected in Hon'ble Chief Justice at Madras High Court, Chennai - 104.
Therefore respondent
suspended by the
Appellate Court while the appeal against the conviction and
sentence is pending before the High Court of Madras.
According to Mr. Venugopal ... second respondent preferred appeals against her conviction
before the High Court at Madras. The appeals are pending. On
applications filed
which the second respondent was released on bail by the Madras High
Court reads, so far as is relevant, as follows :
389. Suspension of sentence ... against the second
respondent. The suspension of the sentence, as the Madras High
Court erroneously called it, was in fact only the suspension
upheld by the decision of the Full Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of, " Agnes Sumathi ... Ammal v. D. Paul ", AIR 1936. Madras 324. the Full Bench" of the Madras High Court observed:
"The Indian Courts have
Madras High Court is reversed by a Full Bench or that Court after 5-7-1954, the Division Bench of the Andhra High Court might ... matter to a Full Bench of the Andhra High Court (now Andhra Pradesh High Court). As we are prima facie inclined, on a plain reading
