Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (1.31 seconds)

D B Roonghta vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Century Enka Ltd vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Konkan Synthetics Fibers vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G M Singhvi vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R S Dhand vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G M Jain vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S B Kamath vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Konkan Synthetics Fibers vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raigad Processors vs Cce Raigad on 20 December, 2019

requested the existing manufactory of appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise, was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the sales effected from depot irrespective
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next