requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
Mahad Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. on 10 November, 2005
Equivalent citations: I(2006)CPJ44(NC)
ORDER ... Ibrahim Taj was engaged in purchase and sale of dry fishes at Mahad, Raigad District, Maharashtra. O.P. No. 2 had three godown Nos. 2694B
held that
deduction u/s. 10B claimed in respect of its Mahad Unit is to be
allowed before setting off the unabsorbed depreciation / losses ... chemical and
had claimed deduction under section 10B of the Act of Mahad Unit, which was
100% EOU. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
requested the existing manufactory of
appellant at C-51, MIDC, Mahad registered under Central Excise,
was altered by constructing a suitable compound wall ... same
when cleared from their facility at Mahad. However they
were recovering the duty @ 36.8% in respect of all the
sales effected from depot irrespective
