learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the cluster of manipulated documents filed with the ROC and placed before this Board have only been ... That the contentious issues raised by the parties regarding fraudulent manipulation of the duplicate share certificates, fabrication of the transfer instruments and other records could
that the petitioners have filed brief synopsis and written submissions alongwith documents on 15.7.2004, when this judgment was being written. Some of the points clarified ... statement on oath of Shri B.D. Agarwal and his certain manipulated accounting documents placed before the assessing officer whereas in the inspection
Section 53(2)(A) of Companies Act, 1956 i.e. service of document/notice shall not be deemed to be effective unless it is sent ... held on 30.9.2003 and the respondents have manipulated the purported documents in the support of alleged AGM and filed the same on record just
proprietary business and accordingly manipulated the signatures obtained in blank income tax return forms and other documents and filed false income tax returns before
produced before this Bench are merely fabricated documents and no reliance can be made on such fabricated documents. It is revealed from copy ... respondent attended the said meeting. This copy of minutes is self-serving document and establishes the fact that no notice of the said annual general
proprietary business and accordingly manipulated the signatures obtained in blank income tax return forms and other documents and filed false income tax returns before
balance sheet of the Company for various years are merely book entries manipulated by the respondents. Moreover, copy of the minutes of Board of directors ... said Board meeting. The respondents have not produced any other document establishing the pre-incorporation expenses, said to have been incurred by them. The allotment
sheets of the Company submitted to this respondent were found to be manipulated balance sheets. The second respondent had produced a fake, forged ... second petitioner and his personal guarantee. All the loan and security documents were executed by the directors including the second petitioner as per the Board
facts, that there were serious allegations of forgery, fraud, collusion, manipulation and misrepresentation. Again in the case of Bipin K. Jain v. Savik Vijay Engg ... Section 111 petition which cannot be adjudicated on the basis of documents made available , but could be decided only on trial by evidence, the Company
himself. By virtue of Section 610(3) , a certified copy of any document issued by the Registrar of Companies will be construed as a true ... fraudulent document, certified copy cannot acquire any sanctity at all Furthermore, the Registrar of Companies does not authenticate the validity of any document, but merely
