Sc No. 19/04 1 State vs Jyotish Prasad Etc. on 2 August, 2008
Sc No. 19/04 1 State vs Jyotish Prasad Etc. on 2 August, 2008
SC
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 194 (1.80 seconds)State vs . Arshad & Ors. on 9 January, 2013
denied the suggestion that the case
property was tempered with and documents were manipulated. Further he
deposed that some threatening letter and audio cassettes were ... there on forcibly. Further he denied the suggestion
that he had manipulated the documents with respect to the hand writing of
accused Arshad. Further
Fir No. 163/08; State vs . Nitin & Anr. Page 1 Of 31 on 25 April, 2012
which is the office order dated 04122006 is manipulated document
FIR No. 163/08; State Vs. Nitin & Anr. Page ... proved by PW3 is not the manipulated document but it has been
issued by PW3 with the approval of Addl. Commissioner (Health).
14. Ld. Defence
Sh. Gulshan Kumar vs Jot Anmol Singh on 13 April, 2023
Singh CR No. 130/2022 Page No.4/14
Thus, the documents were manipulated by making
additions/alterations to this effect after the sale ... kilometers. All these three documents are type written documents
and does not mention these facts. The other documents being relied
upon by the accused persons
State vs . Rajender Sood Etc. on 25 October, 2018
falsely implicated accused persons
and MLC dt. 20.1.2015 is totally manipulated document that is why present
case has been registered.
5. PW 2 Sh. Ashish ... further denied the suggestion that
MLC dt. 20.1.15 is totally manipulated documents that is why present case
has been registered. He further denied the suggestion
State vs . Ram Singh Etc. on 8 September, 2014
that he cannot say if Ex. PW5/A is a manipulated document or not. It is
stated by him that he reached the spot
Sunil Jacob vs State Of Kerala on 31 July, 2008
Addl. Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam after examining 17 witnesses and
marking 10 documents, as per the impugned order dated 26-5-
2008 took cognizance ... early hours of 16-08-2007,
and after preparation of some manipulated forged documents
and wrongful confinement at Thoppumpady Police Station, with
a view
The State Represented By vs A1: Sri.Mohammed Usman Sharief on 14 November, 2016
pendency of civil suit. The suggestion for having
created and manipulated the documents and the suggestions
denying the case of the prosecution as well
Fir No. 198/11 5 State vs . Ajay Kumar & Anr. 1 Of 65 on 18 September, 2021
Fir No. 198/11 5 State vs . Ajay Kumar & Anr. 1 Of 65 on
Fir No. 75/09; State vs . Imrana Etc. Page 1 Of 60 on 31 July, 2014
denied that he had not written
rukka/ tehrir and other memos and documents in the present case in
his handwriting as deposed by him during ... course of
investigation. PW29 further denied that all the memos and
documents were manipulated subsequently in the PS or that no
investigation was conducted