Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Kebala No.7 dated 19.12.1935 produced by the plaintiff is obviously manipulated document brought into light with the dishonest motive of grabbing the land

written at the said time and the above is a document manipulated by the IO/PW2 subsequently. 46. Even regarding the notice ... court to have been manipulated and fabricated subsequently. 47. The next manipulation of the proceedings and documents reflected from the evidence led on record

which is the office order dated 04­12­2006 is manipulated document FIR No. 163/08; State Vs. Nitin & Anr. Page ... proved by PW3 is not the manipulated document but it has been issued by PW3 with the approval of Addl. Commissioner (Health). 14. Ld. Defence

appreciate the fact that the whole story of the complaint was manipulated and failed to appreciate that the purchase order no.512 dated ... same to give a real look to the manipulated document; that complainant in his notice dated 13.12.2005 never mentioned the ordered goods amount which clearly

Rule 11 CPC on 6.2.2007 relying upon those forged and manipulated documents in connivance with accused no. 1 Om Prakash Tuteja. Accused no. 2/ petitioner ... sought to be suggested that the abovesaid shows the manipulations in the documents and thereby the forgery was committed. However I agree with the submission

complaint dt. 23.06.05 allowed to be placed on record is forged document manipulated after filing of the challan. It has been submitted that Investigating Officer ... memo regarding seizure of this document and there is even no mention about seizure of this document in police file. It has further been submitted

upon those forged and Crl. Rev. No.: 42/12 4/9 manipulated documents in connivance with accused no. 1 Om Prakash Tuteja. Accused ... sought to be suggested that the abovesaid shows the manipulations in the documents and thereby the forgery was committed. However I agree with the submission

were prepared after the FIR was registered. Resultantly, the possibility of manipulated documents cannot be ruled out. This in turn points to the possibility

State vs Bhagat Singh Sharma Etc. on 31 August, 2012 IN THE COURT OF SH

connivance with PW-6 by making manipulations in documents. He has not argued on his rashness/negligence or the cause of injuries on the person