entertainment tax, but the question involved
in the matter is manipulation of documents, impersonation
and cheating and the same has to be tried.
5. Having ... manipulated the document of
Form No.3 filed by the first informant, the petitioner has
affixed his photograph on the said document, manipulated
the document
Family Court was rejected. Now the
question is, who has manipulated the documents.
17. The learned counsel for the petitioner has
made an allegation against ... appear
before the Police but the manipulated document is
produced.
18. On perusal of allegation, document is
manipulated that too Court Order and offence
using forged documents as genuine document
and with regard to the same, the witnesses P.Ws.2 to 9 speak
about the manipulation and manipulation ... depose that they have valued the papers and manipulated
document does not contain their signature and whatever marks
they have given
using forged documents as genuine document
and with regard to the same, the witnesses P.Ws.2 to 9 speak
about the manipulation and manipulation ... depose that they have valued the papers and manipulated
document does not contain their signature and whatever marks
they have given
using forged documents as genuine document
and with regard to the same, the witnesses P.Ws.2 to 9 speak
about the manipulation and manipulation ... depose that they have valued the papers and manipulated
document does not contain their signature and whatever marks
they have given
plaintiff has manipulated the documents and come up
with a frivolous suit and hence he is not entitled for any
relief.
8. Based ... suit is barred by limitation and whether
the plaintiff has manipulated the documents and entitled
for the relief. The plaintiff in support of his case
plaintiff has manipulated the documents and come up
with a frivolous suit and hence he is not entitled for any
relief.
8. Based ... suit is barred by limitation and whether
the plaintiff has manipulated the documents and entitled
for the relief. The plaintiff in support of his case
different and the counsel contend
that Ex.D.1 is a manipulated document. The First Appellate
Court on re-appreciation of both oral and documentary
been
considered and it is clearly discloses that it was manipulated the
document - Ex.P5. The Trial Court failed to notice that ... marked in
O.S.No.3648/1985 is a manipulated document and comes to the
conclusion that the same has not been established
DESTROYING DOCUMENTS, CRIMINAL BREACH
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12529
WP No. 107946 of 2015
OF TRUST AND PRACTICING CORRUPTION, CREATING THE
DOCUMENTS, MANIPULATION ... respect of forgery, fraud,
destroying documents, criminal breach of trust and
practicing corruption, creating the documents,
manipulation of the application, preparation of survey
