their case that Annexure 1 and 2 are manipulated
documents and cannot be given effect to. Therefore, the plaintiff had got no
option ... given effect to and moreover, these Annexure 1 and 2 are
manipulated documents and are different than the original documents and none
of these documents
stated that the panchnama Ex.PW4/A is a
manipulated document and it does not contain true facts. He also denied that ... Janpath. He stated
that Ex.PW4/A is a manipulated document. Accused OP Chaudhary stated
that the sanction Ex.PW27/A was granted
document have been found proved by reading the
document in appropriate manner and by considering each and
every word used in such document. The findings ... appellants indicates that they want to rely on the
manipulated document even before this Court. In normal
course, a criminal prosecution of the appellants chould
their case that Annexure 1 and 2 are manipulated
documents and cannot be given effect to. Therefore, the plaintiff had got no
option ... given effect to and moreover, these Annexure 1 and 2 are
manipulated documents and are different than the original documents and none
of these documents
suggestion
that Ex. CW1/3 is a forged and manipulated document as the same had been
generated from the complainant bank. CW1 admitted that ... also argued that returning memo in question is a forged and manipulated
document as the same does not bear any signature, stamp and seal
such renewal but the said letter seems to be a
manipulated document as it was received by the Bank on
09.11.1993 which was much after
James Eazy Franky vs D.R.I on 22 May, 2012
Author: Suresh Kait
Bench
under
Section 36(1)(a) and (b), however, on the basis of documents filed before the
trial court, it cannot be held that the Respondents ... three
petitions are identical and on the face of it, a manipulated document.
Though the applications are dated 2nd December, 2008, however, they refer
plaintiff and a member of the society manipulated the documents for
getting flat done to free hold as DDA organized a Riverside camp in
Mayur ... never issued by
defendant no. 2 but a mere manipulation of documents by Mr. Vashist
who also witnessed the conveyance deed.
9.3 The defendant
rent agreement Ex.PW1/2 dated
10.6.2009 as a manipulated document and which is the conclusion drawn by
the trial Court. The trial Court
