impugned judgment that receipt Ex.CW1/D1 is a manipulated
document and no witness was examined by the appellant to prove
contents ... rightly
held that receipt Ex.CW1/D1 is a manipulated document and has
CA No: 30/13 5/11
Murti Vs. Sunita Sharma
that the same is not maintainable as it is
based upon manipulated documents and has not been signed
by a competent person. On merits, defendant ... plaintiff is based upon manipulated
documents. Moreover, the loan documents have been
appropriately printed on State Bank of India documents and
have been duly signed
said
application was filed, the respondents have categorically
contended that a manipulated document has been filed by
the appellant before this Court and have contended ... produced before this
3
Court by the appellant is a manipulated document and the
same is not true and correct copy of the document kept
learned counsel for the petitioner is
that these are manipulated documents. One is failed to understand that on
one hand he has alleged that ... other hand he has made the statement that these are manipulated
documents. Two different statements made by him are unacceptable to the
court
denied the suggestion that Ex. PW-6/A was a manipulated document and
was not prepared during the discharge of official duty at AIIMS ... record.
4. The MLC Ex. PW-6/A is a manipulated document and has not
been duly proved.
5. Injuries were received by both
manipulated and fabricated document. He
denied that the document pertaining to Sales Tax were manipulated
documents. He denied that the document ... fabricated
and manipulated document. His stock registers, voucher books and
the ledgers did not bear the signatures of the auditor at any place.
Voluntarily deposed
been produced by
the petitioner. In fact, in the list, manipulation was done in the
description of respondent No.5. Though his surname was
shown ... made by the respondent
No.5 in the return that a manipulated document was filed by
the petitioner to show as if the respondent
recorded earlier.
This clearly indicates an attempt in manipulating the
documents with the support of police and as well as doctors
of said hospital. Further ... Apex Court has said that when fraud is committed
in manipulating the documents and for which time is spent
by the claimants causing delay
dated 15.05.2006 propounded by the
plaintiff is either forged or a manipulated document and in any case, the
plaintiff is required to prove the alleged
illness. Thus the letter dated 06.05.1989 is forged and manipulated document.
11. In reply to the supplementary counter affidavits filed by Sri Jogendra Kumar, Superintendent
