The Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987
ANDHRA PRADESH
India
mathadhipathi or a trustee of a specific endowment attached to a math, if he (a) is of unsound mind ; (b) is suffering from any physical ... appropriation in respect of any of the properties of the math ; (f) commits persistent and willful default in the exercise of his powers or performance
clear that the appellant Math was never treated as the owner of the suit properties. The appellant Math also cannot be treated as a trustee ... property, the question of properties reverting back to her also will not arise. Following the death of Basavaraj Swamiji on 16.8.1970, until the plaintiff Math
this Court, will not only bring the Math in question to its lost glory of healthy religious activities, rites and rituals, but will also ... that the Math is developed into an ideal place of worship for the actual beneficiaries, namely, its devotees and that its properties and income
Dasi was the owner of the property in question.
She was aged about 70 years when a Will was allegedly executed ... beneficiary of the Will was the
first respondent herein. The testatrix was living in a math known as Bharati Math
at Puri. In the Will
charge shall be enforced against any
property in the hands of a person to whom such property
has been transferred for consideration and without notice ... Rule 1 CPC ; otherwise he will not be
bound by the decree passed in the suit and will continue
to retain his right of redemption
Shankaracharya of the Math on June 25, 1953, that he came into possession of the properties of the Math and, therefore, the Court should appoint ... nominated as the Head of the Math and therefore, his installation as the Shankaracharya of the Math on June 12, 1953, was invalid. There
have opined as follows (paras 20 and 21):
The property belonging to a 'math' is in fact attached to the office ... From these principles, it will be sufficiently clear that a math is an institutional sanctum presided over by a superior who combines in himself
expressed a desire that the plaintiff should be his successor of the properties.
13. The cross examination of all the plaintiffs witnesses has not brought ... cross examination of the plaintiff as propounder of the will by Shri Bal Krishna Narain, Advocate for the defendant it was stated by him that
which have received general recognition from judicial decisions, the property in dispute is a religious property which vested in Mathra Dass - deceased as a Mahant ... Mahant depends upon the custom and usage of the particular "Math" and that each institution has his own usage governing such succession